HKUBS_Standard_Coloured_Shield_Blue_Text_Logo - 380
  • Global Presence
  • About Us
        • About us about us
        • A Premier Business School in Asia with Global Influence
        • Overview
          • Message from the Dean
          • Vision & Mission
          • Milestones
          • Partnerships & Global Network
          • Beta Gamma Sigma HKU Chapter
          • Rankings & Accreditations
          • Corporate Collaboration
        • Leadership
          • Faculty Management
          • International Advisory Council
        • Our Stories
        • Contact Us
        • Staff Portal
        • Campuses
  • Programmes
        • Programmes programmes
        • Diversified Learning Experience Empowers our Students
        • Undergraduate
        • Masters
          • MAA
          • MAcct
          • MCGRM
          • MEcon
          • MFWM
          • MFin
          • MFFinTech
          • MGM
          • MSAF
          • MSc(BA)
          • MScMktg
          • MWM
        • MBAs & EMBAs
          • MBA
          • IMBA
          • HKU EMBA
        • PhD
        • Executive Education
        • DBA
  • People
        • People people
        • International Faculty Body that Offers Quality Education
        • Faculty
        • Post-Doctoral Fellows
        • Demonstrators/ Teaching Assistants
        • Research Postgraduate Students
        • Administration
  • Research
        • Research research
        • Lead the Frontier of Knowledge Creation
        • Thought Leadership
          • Latest Research Publications
          • HKEJ Column
          • FT Chinese Column
          • In the Media
        • Academic Areas
        • Faculty Members
        • Research Grants
        • Seminars & Conferences
          • Edward K Y Chen Distinguished Lecture Series
        • Research Centres & Institutes
        • Hong Kong Macroeconomics Forecast
        • HKU Knowledge Exchange
        • HKU Scholars Hub
        • Shenzhen Research Institutes
  • Events
  • Media
        • Media media
        • Inspire the Society and Community with Rigorous Insights
        • School News
        • In the Media
        • Press Release
  • Career
        • Career career
        • Fostering Strategic Partnerships and Talent Development
        • Recruit our Talents
        • Student Career Development
        • Career Opportunities
          • Faculty Recruitments
          • HKU Career Site
  • 繁
  • 简
Type To Search
HKUBS_Standard_Coloured_Shield_Blue_Text_Logo - 380
Type To Search
  • Global Presence
  • About Us
        • About us about us
        • A Premier Business School in Asia with Global Influence
        • Overview
          • Message from the Dean
          • Vision & Mission
          • Milestones
          • Partnerships & Global Network
          • Beta Gamma Sigma HKU Chapter
          • Rankings & Accreditations
          • Corporate Collaboration
        • Leadership
          • Faculty Management
          • International Advisory Council
        • Our Stories
        • Contact Us
        • Staff Portal
        • Campuses
  • Programmes
        • Programmes programmes
        • Diversified Learning Experience Empowers our Students
        • Undergraduate
        • Masters
          • MAA
          • MAcct
          • MCGRM
          • MEcon
          • MFWM
          • MFin
          • MFFinTech
          • MGM
          • MSAF
          • MSc(BA)
          • MScMktg
          • MWM
        • MBAs & EMBAs
          • MBA
          • IMBA
          • HKU EMBA
        • PhD
        • Executive Education
        • DBA
  • People
        • People people
        • International Faculty Body that Offers Quality Education
        • Faculty
        • Post-Doctoral Fellows
        • Demonstrators/ Teaching Assistants
        • Research Postgraduate Students
        • Administration
  • Research
        • Research research
        • Lead the Frontier of Knowledge Creation
        • Thought Leadership
          • Latest Research Publications
          • HKEJ Column
          • FT Chinese Column
          • In the Media
        • Academic Areas
        • Faculty Members
        • Research Grants
        • Seminars & Conferences
          • Edward K Y Chen Distinguished Lecture Series
        • Research Centres & Institutes
        • Hong Kong Macroeconomics Forecast
        • HKU Knowledge Exchange
        • HKU Scholars Hub
        • Shenzhen Research Institutes
  • Events
  • Media
        • Media media
        • Inspire the Society and Community with Rigorous Insights
        • School News
        • In the Media
        • Press Release
  • Career
        • Career career
        • Fostering Strategic Partnerships and Talent Development
        • Recruit our Talents
        • Student Career Development
        • Career Opportunities
          • Faculty Recruitments
          • HKU Career Site
HKUBS_Standard_Coloured_Shield_Blue_Text_Logo - 380
  • Global Presence
  • About Us
    • Overview
      • Message from the Dean
      • Vision & Mission
      • Milestones
      • Partnerships & Global Network
      • Beta Gamma Sigma HKU Chapter
      • Rankings & Accreditations
      • Corporate Collaboration
    • Leadership
      • Faculty Management
      • International Advisory Council
    • Our Stories
    • Contact Us
    • Staff Portal
    • Campuses
  • Programmes
    • Undergraduate
    • Masters
      • MAA
      • MAcct
      • MCGRM
      • MEcon
      • MFWM
      • MFin
      • MFFinTech
      • MGM
      • MSAF
      • MSc(BA)
      • MScMktg
      • MWM
    • MBAs & EMBAs
      • MBA
      • IMBA
      • HKU EMBA
    • DBA
    • PhD
    • Executive Education
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Post-Doctoral Fellows
    • Demonstrators/ Teaching Assistants
    • Research Postgraduate Students
    • Administration
  • Research
    • Thought Leadership
      • Latest Research Publications
      • HKEJ Column
      • FT Chinese Column
      • In the Media
    • Academic Areas
    • Faculty Members
    • Research Grants
    • Seminars & Conferences
      • Edward K Y Chen Distinguished Lecture Series
    • Research Centres & Institutes
    • Hong Kong Macroeconomics Forecast
    • HKU Knowledge Exchange
    • HKU Scholars Hub
    • Shenzhen Research Institutes
  • Events
  • Media
    • School News
    • In the Media
    • Press Release
  • Career
    • Recruit our Talents
    • Student Career Development
    • Career Opportunities
      • Faculty Recruitments
      • HKU Career Site

Thought Leadership

Home Research Thought Leadership
Asymmetric Fertility Elasticities

Asymmetric Fertility Elasticities

24 Nov 2024
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsappShare on LinkedInShare on Email
Key Takeaways
  • Countries around the world are struggling with below-replacement fertility rates, defined as 2.1 children per woman.
  • Anecdotal evidence shows anti-fertility campaigns have seen great success, but most pro-fertility policies have had only a minimal effect.
  • This paper presents systematic empirical evidence demonstrating fertility rates respond more to anti-fertility policies than pro-fertility policies.
  • The asymmetry in the effectiveness of fertility policies can be explained by households’ loss aversion regarding living standards.
  • The dynamic model with loss aversion implies fertility rates can fall on their own even without changes in the underlying economic fundamentals, providing a new angle from which to interpret the global fertility decline in recent decades.
  • With asymmetric fertility elasticities, policymakers should set a higher fertility-rate target than previously thought and be extra cautious in preventing anti-fertility campaigns from overshooting.

Source Publication: Zhou A, Pang C, Engle S. Asymmetric Fertility Elasticities. Available at SSRN 4912608, 2024.

Background

Many governments around the world are struggling with below-replacement fertility rates. Recent efforts to increase birth rates have produced disappointing outcomes, which contrast sharply with the success of anti-fertility policies implemented in the past. Is it systematically more difficult to raise fertility than to reduce it? If so, what are the micro foundations and the macro implications of this phenomenon? Zhou A, Pang C, Engle S. (2024) provides a comprehensive analysis of this issue.

Method

The study compares the impact of anti-fertility policies on fertility rates with that of pro-fertility policies in a range of econometric specifications. First, the study estimates fertility responses to policy stances using (1) panel regression and policy reversal specifications on aggregate-level data from the United Nations and (2) cohort-exposure design on individual-level data across countries from the World Value Survey (WVS). Furthermore, the study collects data on the funding of anti-fertility policies, estimates the elasticity of fertility in response to policy funding, and compares the results with the pro-fertility elasticities found in the literature.

 

The study then explains the empirical findings by developing a model that incorporates loss aversion from behavioral economics into a standard fertility choice model. Then, the study extends the model to a dynamic setting to explore the macroeconomic implications of asymmetric fertility elasticities.

Figure 1. The Asymmetric Effect between Anti-fertility Policies and Pro-fertility Policies

Figure 2. The “Slippery Slope” of Aggregate Fertility Rate

Results

In both aggregate-level and individual-level specifications, the study finds anti-fertility policies are more effective than pro-fertility policies. Additionally, the study finds the asymmetric effects of fertility policies persist even after accounting for heterogeneity in policy intensities.

 

 

The asymmetry in the effect of fertility policies contradicts existing fertility choice models, which predict symmetric fertility responses to increases or decreases in the shadow price of children. To explain the empirical findings about asymmetric fertility elasticities, the study proposes a novel theory of fertility choice by incorporating loss aversion regarding living standards into standard models. Due to the trade-off between fertility and living standards in the budget constraint, households with loss aversion concerning their current lifestyle are more reluctant to increase fertility than to reduce it upon symmetric incremental changes in the shadow price of children.

 

 

The study then embeds the model with asymmetric fertility elasticities into a dynamic framework, where households’ reference point for consumption follows an adaptive updating process with random shocks. Asymmetric fertility elasticities have two important dynamic implications: (1) The fertility rate can decline on its own even without changes in the underlying economic fundamentals, and (2) if the government is concerned about fertility rates being too high or too low, the cost-minimizing fertility-rate target should be higher than previously thought.

Implications

A remarkable reversal has occurred in the past few decades as many countries have shifted their policy priorities from suppressing to maintaining or promoting childbirth. However, as this study shows, raising the fertility rate is significantly more difficult than reducing it.

 

 

The study offers a new angle from which to interpret the global fertility decline in the past few decades. Due to the presence of asymmetric fertility elasticities, random shocks are more likely to increase households’ lifestyle reference point than to decrease it. This increase in the lifestyle reference point then leads to the continuous decline in the fertility rate. Unlike traditional theories, this process doesn’t require exogenous changes in factors such as the return to education, the opportunity cost of children, and so on.

 

 

This study also has important policy implications for policymakers. Because loss aversion exerts downward pressure on fertility, fertility tends to decline on its own even without policy interventions. Therefore, governments have precautionary motives to set a fertility target higher than the replacement rate, which many policymakers previously thought was the optimal level (Striessnig and Lutz, 2013). Ignoring asymmetric fertility elasticities and targeting fertility rates to the replacement level can lead to significant welfare losses.

Reference

Striessnig, Erich and Wolfgang Lutz, “Can below-replacement fertility be desirable?” Empirica, 2013, 40, 409–425.

Does Socially Responsible Investing Change Firm Behavior?12 Nov 2024
The Effect of New Technologies on Workers, Jobs, and Skills3 Dec 2024
Trending
Carbon-Transition Risk and Net-Zero Portfolios
Carbon-Transition Risk and Net-Zero Portfolios
Key Takeaways Net-zero portfolios (NZPs), managing over $130 trillion USD in assets, align financial performance with climate goals. These portfolios reward firms that actively reduce emissions while excluding those lagging behind, driving market incentives for decarbonization. The study introduces distance to exit (DTE), a forward-looking metric that measures a firm’s risk of exclusion from NZPs based on its carbon footprint and decarbonization efforts. Firms with higher DTEs—seen as safer from exclusion—tend to have higher valuations but lower expected returns, highlighting the market’s pricing of carbon-transition risks. DTE serves as both a risk measure and a catalyst for action, incentivizing firms to accelerate decarbonization to remain in NZPs, while enabling portfolios to achieve up to 95% reductions in carbon intensity without sacrificing sector diversification. Source Publication: 
10 Jan 2025
Research
Trade, Trees, and Lives
Trade, Trees, and Lives
Key Takeaways The agricultural export value of Brazil has quadrupled over the last two decades due to rising global demand. Brazil’s agricultural export boom drives deforestation: between 1997 and 2019, trade-induced agricultural expansion led to the loss of 3.6 million hectares of forest. Trade-induced deforestation causes severe health consequences: it results in over 700,000 premature deaths, primarily from cardio-respiratory diseases linked to pollution from deforestation in upwind areas. The economic cost of these deaths is estimated at $513 billion USD—about 18% of Brazil’s total agricultural export value during the same period. These findings highlight the negative health impacts of trade-induced deforestation and the resulting regional inequality, because mortality costs and economic benefits are not always shared by the same populations. Source Publication: 
8 Jan 2025
Research
Anson Linshuo ZHOU
About Author
Prof. Anson Linshuo ZHOU

Assistant Professor

Sign up for upcoming news and events
LinkedIn WeChat Instagram Facebook Weibo Twitter YouTube

©2025, HKU Business School. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Statement