Mingzhu TAI
Prof. Mingzhu TAI
Finance
Associate Professor
Associate Director, Institute of Behavioural and Decision Science
MFin Deputy Programme Director

3917 1676

KK 1115

Academic & Professional Qualification
  • Ph.D. in Business Economics, Harvard University, 2017
  • Master in Finance, Tsinghua University, 2011
  • Visiting Scholar, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 2010
  • Bachelor in Finance, Tsinghua University, 2009
Biography

Mingzhu TAI joined HKU after receiving her Ph.D in Business Economics from Harvard University in 2017. Before that she received her Master and Bachelor degrees in Finance from Tsinghua University.

Mingzhu’s research interests mainly include consumer and household finance, financial intermediation and general corporate finance. She is currently working to understand the relationship between banks, real estate markets, financial regulations, and credit activities by consumers and businesses.

Teaching
  • 2018                 Corporate Finance, University of Hong Kong
                              Course instructor
  • Spring, 2014   Psychology and Economics, Harvard University
                              Head teaching fellow for Professors David Laibson and Tomasz Strzalecki
Research Interest
  • Corporate Finance
  • Household Finance
  • Financial Intermediation
  • Behavioral Finance
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Law and Finance
Selected Publications
  • “Colonial Legacy and Informal Finance”, with Jiafu An and Chen Lin, Management Science. Forthcoming.
  • “Attention Constraints and Financial Inclusion”, with Bo Huang, Jiacui Li, Tse-Chun Lin, and Yiyuan Zhou. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Forthcoming.
  • Credit Conditions and Mental Health”, 2025. with Qing Hu, Ross Levine, and Chen Lin. Management Science. 71(3), 1967-1987.
  • “Stress Testing Banks’ Digital Capabilities: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic”, 2024. with Alan Kwan, Chen Lin, and Vesa Pursiainen, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 59(6), 2618-2646.
  • “Lending Next to the Courthouse: Exposure to Adverse Events and Mortgage Lending Decisions”, 2024. with Da Huo, Bo Sun, and Yuhai Xuan, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 59(5), 2375-2398.
  • “Credit Environment and Small Business Dynamics: Evidence from Establishment-Level Data”, 2023. with Chen Lin and Wensi Xie, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 12(2), 326–365.
  • “Paying for Beta: Embedded Leverage and Asset Management Fees”, 2022. with Steffen Hitzemann and Stanislav Sokolinski, Journal of Financial Economics. 145(1), 105-128.
  • How Did Depositors Respond to COVID-19?”, 2021. with Ross Levine, Chen Lin, and Wensi Xie, Review of Financial Studies. 34(11), 5438-5473.
Recent Publications
Attention Constraints and Financial Inclusion

We show that attention constraints of decision makers function as barriers to financial inclusion. Using administrative data on retail loan screening processes, we find that loan officers exert less effort reviewing applicants from unattractive social or economic backgrounds and reject them more frequently than justified by credit quality. More importantly, when quasi-random workload variations tighten officer attention constraints, unattractive applicants receive even worse treatment—review-time halves and approval rates drop by approximately 40%—while attractive applicants are not affected. Our findings suggest that financial technologies that reduce information-processing costs may promote more balanced financial access.

Colonial Legacy and Informal Finance

An influential line of research emphasizes that colonial legacy plays a key role in formal financial development. Can colonial legacy also shape informal finance? We investigate the impact of colonial legacy on informal financial development using a manually georeferenced data set within a credible empirical framework. In the 19th century, Europeans arbitrarily designed colonial borders that partitioned many ethnicities across multiple countries in Africa. Leveraging several spatial regression discontinuity designs across national borders and within British-French–partitioned Cameroon and a unique natural experiment where the same former British colony is compared with two otherwise similar areas with different exposures to French colonization, we discover that former British colonies today have better informal financial development than former French colonies. Exploring the channels, we find that places with a British colonial legacy maintain a style of social control that facilitates information flow, supports private enforcement and market interactions, and promotes strong legal cultures.

Credit Market Conditions and Mental Health

Research offers conflicting predictions about the impact of credit conditions on mental health. We first assess how bank regulatory reforms that improved credit conditions, for example, by enhancing the efficiency of credit allocation and lowering lending rates, impacted mental health. We discover that among low-income individuals, these regulatory reforms reduced mental depression, boosted labor market outcomes, eased access to mortgage debt, and reduced the ranks of the “unbanked.” We also find that mergers of large regional banks that led to branch closures and tighter credit constraints in affected counties harmed the mental health of lower-income individuals in treated counties.

How Effective is Hong Kong’s MPF? A Critical Review of the Mandatory Provident Fund Scheme

Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) is a compulsory saving scheme for the retirement of residents in Hong Kong. Over the past 25 years, the MPF has succeeded in encouraging household participation in securities markets and played a crucial role in improving financial inclusion in Hong Kong. However, it has faced ongoing criticisms for its low annualized rate of return. With the upcoming launch of the e-MPF platform to integrate disparate savings schemes into a single digital system, it presents a well-timed opportunity to drastically improve Hong Kong’s primary retirement savings system.

Stress Testing Banks’ Digital Capabilities: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Banks’ information technology (IT) capabilities affect their ability to serve customers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which generates an unexpected and unprecedented shock that shifts banking services from in-person to digital. Amid mobility restrictions, banks with better IT experience larger reductions in physical branch visits and larger increases in website traffic, implying a larger shift to digital banking. Stronger IT banks are able to originate more Paycheck Protection Program loans to small business borrowers, especially in areas with more severe COVID-19 outbreaks, higher internet use, and higher bank competition. Those banks also attract more deposit flows and receive better mobile customer reviews during the pandemic.

Lending Next to the Courthouse: Exposure to Adverse Events and Mortgage Lending Decisions

Adverse market events can affect credit supply not only by hurting financial fundamentals but also by changing the risk-taking behaviors of individual decision makers. We provide micro-level evidence of this individual decision-making channel in the U.S. mortgage market. We find that mortgage application rejection rates are more sensitive to foreclosure intensity when loan officers are more exposed to foreclosure news, despite the same housing market and bank fundamentals. Loans originated from the affected branches have lower ex-post default rates, consistent with higher lending standards being applied. In the aggregate, this effect results in tighter credit supply during housing market downturns.

Paying for Beta: Leverage Demand and Asset Management Fees

We examine how investor demand for leverage shapes asset management fees. We show that in the sample of U.S. equity mutual funds: (1) fees increase in fund market beta precisely for beta larger than one; (2) this relation becomes stronger and high-beta funds experience larger inflows when leverage constraints tighten; and (3) low net alphas are especially common among high-beta funds. These results are consistent with a model in which asset managers compete for leverage-constrained investors with heterogeneous risk aversion. The asymmetric relation between betas and fees also extends to the HML and SMB factors.

Future Anxiety – How COVID-19 Led People to Save More Money

Take the recent study by Chen Lin and Mingzhu Tai from the HKU Business School, conducted with collaborators from the University of California, Berkeley and the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Their paper addressed a fundamental worry for almost everyone during the pandemic: Money. Specifically, they examined how people in the U.S. saved money in response to COVID-19.

How Did Depositors Respond to COVID-19?

Why did banks experience massive deposit inflows during the pandemic? We discover that deposit interest rates at bank branches in counties with higher COVID-19 infection rates fell by more than rates at branches—even branches of the same bank—in counties with lower infection rates. Credit drawdowns, national policies, such as the Payment Protection Program, and a flight-to-safety do not account for these cross-branch changes in deposit rates. Evidence suggests that higher local COVID-19 infection rates are associated with households’ greater anxiety about future job and income losses, anxiety that induces households to reduce spending and increase deposits.